Warning: mysql_fetch_array(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in
/home1/uwodb/public_html/eg/info145.php on line
247
Custom Armoured Vaisseau
200
Custom Armoured Vaisseau with improved Sail Performance
and Turning Speed.

Build Original Ship
-
Base Performance
120
250
0
720
9
7
39
Ship Hold info
58/112
92
516
Sailing Requirements
42
32
68
Studding Sail: 4, Broadside: 5
Special Equipment: 2, Bow Turret: 1
Extra Armouring: 3, Stern Turret: 1
Optional Skill
Refitting
Range 540 ~ 900
Effective Range 576 ~ 870
Volume 720 (Custom Armoured Vaisseau Cabin 112 + Cannon Chambers 92 + Hold 516)
Cabin: (50% or Sailors required 120%) ~ 150%
Cannon Chambers: 50% ~ 150%
Hold: Volume - Cabin - Cannon Chambers = Hold
Custom Armoured Vaisseau Cabin: 69 ~ 168 Cannon Chambers: 46 ~ 138
Range 900 - 69 - 46 = 785
Effective Range 870 - 69 - 46 = 755

Miyo
07-04-2012
how would you get 68 battle for this ship isent the max level 65 :)

Chester
07-04-2012
I've heard that its only the GAMA server thats lvl capped to 65. The other servers are lvl capped at 70.

Nina
07-04-2012
the lvl cap going to rise once EA comes out for GAMA

Francine
07-06-2012
What material will this be? Iron?

Carla
07-06-2012
an armoured vaiss with 1008 dura is iron so this is iron yes

Dongwoo
11-12-2012
Selling one at 250m PM me ingame 'Sinistress' or PM 'Rhondal' Ty.

Rhondal
11-12-2012
Not sure who is trying to be funny but im not selling no ship

Carla
11-12-2012
this ship is not yet in game...

AquaNerd
11-14-2012
Available now from tbox, gama server

Wen zhi
11-14-2012
How much and how many can use, T-box ship which requires Maritime 68 *sigh*

Carla
11-14-2012
Better than MAV but sailing requirement is much higher. What's the Max improvement?

Lisa
11-14-2012
@Wen zhi
Rich noobs can't use it.
@Carla
Is only 5/5. Check simulator.

Lewis
11-14-2012
Wonder why this ship requires lv68. There are more battle ships that is better (MFCV for example) that requires much lower level.

Enver
11-14-2012
Look like a bad ship with high requirement. Worth how much?

Wen zhi
11-14-2012
For +2 Turn and +3 Armour. 5/5 will not make it better than a MAV which is 7/7. - Not Flaming, just pointing it out so people don't rush off and spend mega ducats on mega crap. However... If it was in actual fact a x/7 boat.. whole different story. Can anybody that owns one or knows somebody with one confirm the actual modification limits please ?

LukeCoolhair
11-15-2012
Even if you could make it go higher, once you up it, the level requirement would go up. I think this ship was designed for asian server since they got EA first and then they came up with a MAV.

Sophia
11-15-2012
maybe it can have some other nice skills different from AV/MAV, e.g. improved gunport. better to ask some GM, ppl who have experience in asian server

LukeCoolhair
11-16-2012
looks llke same skill set as AV, just tried to do improved gun port and gave me training bombing instead.

Miyo
03-09-2013
NC ships' design is so random.
First it's the name confusion, it must be hard for new players to remember NC ships. Custom and Modified could've been differentiated as one for low level requirement another for higher level, or one lower tier (less OP) than the other, or whatever, but no it's all just random. Then Ambush is a name for NC ships but it's also used in non NC ships like Ambush Atakebune is not NC. And if all FCV have a word before them H-FCV, A-FCV, F-FCV, M-FCV, then why is it FC-F-V?
Ok and then with number of mods, why do AV get 10/10 anyway? Why do HFCV get 6/6 but CAV only get 5/5? Who would use CAV anyway? If its stats bonus are negligible and it cannot be improved more than normal Armoured Vaiss then the non NC version is better cause it can use Official Hull. Who the hell designed CAV?

Port Official
03-09-2013
CAV design is extremelly old, but didnt appeared because MAV and MFCV. But, CAV isnt broken, should be a very strong ship when no FS system exists, and that happened in GAMA as example... when the best ship was iron 0/5 vaisseau, MAV and MFCV appeared... that long time ago, also, level cap was 65, too, so CAV did never had a chance to be used.

Lena
03-13-2013
Port Official, before FS system exist the level was capped at lv65 right? Even in other servers.

Sakura
03-13-2013
How much is this worth?

Cornelia
03-13-2013
+3 armour +2 turn +10/+20 sails with less cargo... all this not as good as 2 more mods of MAV

Misun
03-13-2013
Also worse than ArmVaiss which can use official hull. Higher level requirement than ArmVaiss too which is just plain lol.

Misun
03-27-2013
This ship is worthless, won't buy it for 500m. Players that has the requirements to use it, can use better and cheaper ships...the is "NC Failed Ship Edition"

Liza
03-27-2013
it is a little bit better than an offical AV (cargo can be reduced for another +1TS, slightly better base-stats), but overall probably one of the worst NC ships out there

Miyo
04-10-2013
In TB again, read posts above, explains why this is worse than non-nc Armoured Vaisseau if you are using official hull.
And why put Mod Indiaman and not Festive Indiaman? Mod Indiaman so outdated with current standards.

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]04-10-2013
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]

Kicker
04-10-2013
Ya I tried using simulator normal ArmVaiss can get +250 dura +8 turn without any nc dgaff. If you put a nc dstorm or just a large storm sail you can get >11 wr. That's if you choose APN+ComPost. If you want BPA just put it on original.
This ship, same build, you only get like +180 dura. The buffed sails and +2 turn +2 armour do not make up for its loss.

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]04-19-2013
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]04-23-2013
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]04-23-2013
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]04-23-2013
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]11-29-2013
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]11-29-2013
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]01-11-2014
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]01-11-2014
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]01-11-2014
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]02-13-2014
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]02-13-2014
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]02-13-2014
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]02-13-2014
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]

[Purification FleetA]">
[Purification FleetA]02-13-2014
[This comment has been deleted by a moderator of this site.]
Please log in or register to reply.